Creationism is alive and well in the United States. Despite their laughingly terrible arguments, backers of “intelligent design” continue to flood education institutions with materials they hope will throw doubt as to the truth of Evolution by means of Natural selection .Their latest tactic is this book; a republication of Darwin’s “Origin of Species” with a twist; the introduction is a 50 page attack on Darwin, accusing him of the causing the Holocaust, of being a racist (find me one person living in 19th century England that wasn’t), and of even doubting the truth of his own theory. They misquote him at every turn (a tactic that Ben Stein used extensively in his terrible movie “Expelled: No intelligence allowed”), and suggest that Darwin wanted to use evolution to justify genocide.  Here are some choice passages:

Do you think that DNA’s amazing structure could have come together by accident? Or does it point to an intelligent Designer? Even the director of the U.S. National Human Genome Research Institute concluded there is a God based on his study of DNA.

Richard Dawkins, arguably the most famous of atheists, can’t claim the title “atheist,” because he understands that something must have created everything. He said, “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.”

Keeping in mind that the most intelligent of human beings can’t create a grain of sand from nothing, do you think that that “something” that made everything was intelligent? It obviously is; and if you do believe the “force” that made the flowers, the birds, the trees, the human eye, and the sun, the moon and the stars was intelligent, you then believe that there was an intelligent designer. You have just become an unscientific knuckle-dragger in the eyes of our learning institutions that embrace Darwinism.

Jesus freak extrordinaire Kirk Cameron is the mastermind behind this project. He wants his copy of Origins to be picked up by schools. Personally, I’m sickened by the idea that these intellectual midgets would publish one of the most important scientific theories of all time with a 50 page indictment in the front. What a strange schyzophrenic message that must seem to children! It’s not enough for these guys to let the material stand on it’s own right; they have to try to sabotage the learning process in order to force their sky god down our throats.

Hey guys, how would you like it if I started printing Bibles with a disclaimer at the front that said: “Warning, materials covered in this book are of a racist, bigoted and violent nature. It should be kept well out of the reach of children, and people with a history of mental disorder should avoid reading it. The characters depicted are fictional; and any similarity with persons living or deceased is entirely coincidental.” Would you find that offensive? You know what, that gives me an idea…

NOTE: I’ve just recorded a podcast with more details about Kirk, his organization, and his recruiting techniques. Click here to listen to our popular podcast!

Spread the outrage

 

5 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Trackback: popurls.com // popular today on June 24, 2009
  2. Pingback: The Morningstarr* - Origin of Species - with a few extras on June 24, 2009
  3. Pingback: links for 2009-06-25 | Nerdcore on June 26, 2009
  4. Pingback: Kirk Cameron’s “crocoduck”. Infallible proof that evolution is wrong! | The Good Atheist on June 27, 2009
  5. Pingback: The last Darwin lecture and the real ‘Origin of Species’ « Antimatter on December 14, 2009

206 Comments

  1. Richard Feinburg

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Wow, this is a new low for Kirk Cameron.


  2. nem0

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    You know that icon of Psyduck holding his head in obvious pain and annoyance? I’m doing that right now.

    What the mad fuck, Kirk Cameron? The saddest part is that he probably thinks this is cleverly subversive.


  3. LB

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Did anyone else notice the quote on the site:

    “It’s like a book with multiple personality disorder — two parts that absolutely hate each other; an intro that is the inane product of one of the most stupid minds of our century, and a science text that is the product of one of the greatest minds of the author’s century.”
    - PZ Myers, biologist and associate professor at the University of Minnesota, Morris

    This is seriously a new low for the creation movement. I suppose after losing in the courts they must feel the only way they can win is to lie outright.


  4. chocobar

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    If your idea is to publish the bible with a new 50 intro, i say go for it and how can I help. If these are the tactics theists are using, then we should do the same. I can only imagine the publicity and “controversy” this would generate in the media. Especially on FOX news.


  5. Nathan

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    The funny thing is after you have read the first 50 pages of mindless arguments against the book, the rest details something completely different, showing that Kirk didn’t even read the book he is claiming is wrong.

    The sad thing is that if this gets put in schools, kids will read the intro thinking its true and not read the rest of the book properly, if at all.

    To combat this, someone needs to make a similar version of the bible, one that actually addresses the book itself, and then present it to Kirk


  6. Benjamin Geiger

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    I still don’t quite understand why they put PZ’s quote on their page. Unless it’s to say “look what those mean atheists are saying now”…


  7. Stirling

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    The quote at the bottom of the page made me laugh. I don’t think this guy even read it before publishing.

    The Bible with a disclaimer is a great idea. We could try and get into as many churches and religious organizations as possible.


  8. Whatdayathink

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    This is an abomination. I just have a few questions: Is the Origin of Species our of copyright? Can someone sue to stop this? Is there a copyright on the bible? Where do I send my check to fund 50 pages it the forward of the bible? When does Kirk Cameron get committed for our safety?


  9. Jacob Fortin

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    You can’t really do anything to stop these guys. The book is public domain, but technically, so is the Bible. We should create a special “annotated” Bible for everyone as revenge for this…


  10. Kris

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    I think the best part about this, thinking back to my early school career, is that I nor my peers ever read the introduction to any assigned reading. Who bothers to read the introduction in public school? As far as I was concerned, it was a pain to have to read anything by some lame bearded dude, let alone the part they aren’t testing on. While this type of attitude is lamentable, it just might save some kid someday from this book! Yay Laziness!


  11. Roxanne

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    @Jacob: they have the skeptics Bible on the internet, why shouldn’t we take it to the next level? :-D


  12. Justin

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Tell you what, if you print that version of the Bible, I will gladly buy it to add on to my collection.


  13. Heidi

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Thanks for posting this. I just bought a hardcover copy of Origin. Minus the jesus freaks, fortunately. http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1402756399/ It’s pretty nice. But there is a jesus freak one star review on the page, by someone who says he denies that “evolution created the universe.” Guess he didn’t read the book.

    I love the idea of an annotated bible, btw. Brilliant!


  14. Jerry

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    “What would Jesus do?” Apparently, he would trick people who are looking to read an important work of science into reading blatant religious propaganda.


  15. astine

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    *Hey guys, how would you like it if I started printing Bibles with a disclaimer at the front*

    Been done: http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/


  16. anonymous

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    couldn’t all of these religious zealots find a real problem to attack rather than science? i can think of some people around the world in real need of help, in more dire situations than reading a scientific theory.


  17. Alex Mcquown

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Here’s an easy way to put an end to this book – buy it, find out it’s not what you originally expected, and sue the hell out of Kirk for product misrepresentation. Make him so broke he’ll wish he never dared to do such a thing.

    Sue the publisher as well.


  18. LB

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Anybody know who the publisher of this tripe is?


  19. Anon

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Stopping the printing is impossible, why not start a project to razor the first 50 pgs out of every distributed copy…Worldcat FTW


  20. yep

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Just wondering, Have you ever heard of social Darwinism? Most eugenicists justified their view point with the “scientific enlightenment” that Darwin introduced to society.


  21. Jeffrey

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    OK, I have a copy of Origin Of Species, and it has about twice as many pages as this ‘abridged’ copy, did they just edit out all the big words?

    I find it sooo ironic that those asshats who claim to have the moral highground never seem to have any problem stretching the truth to it’s breaking point. Good thing they have Jesus to forgive them.


  22. Beer

    June 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    This strategy isn’t really news. Comfort has a blog called “Atheist Central”, the Disco-tute has their “Evolution News & Views” blog. If you really want to stoop to their level, then I’d suggest registering a domain attractive to christians and then host an atheist blog on it or set it up as a re-direction to TGA or something like that. Razoring pages from books is silly, you may as well join the anti-gay people calling for a book burning outside of their library. As noted above we already have the skeptic annotated bible which is hosted online and free for anyone. The cool thing about the skeptics annotated bible is that it addresses directly what is written in the bible as apposed to a 50 page fallacy riddled introduction by a person who doesn’t comprehend the information being presented therein. The only thing I’m wondering about is: This is an abridged edition, which probably means there is the possibility of quote-mining and leaving out the rest of the statements that would put the quotes into proper context. Darwin wrote in great detail the reasons why he came to his conclusions; if you abridge the book, you can just leave all those details out. The people who order books from Kirk and Ray are not people who care about facts and reason. They have been selling the “Atheist’s Bible” and the “Charles Darwin Bible” for a long time. I expect that there will be nothing new in this book as far as arguments and challenges. The only thing I think is sad is that they will cowardly hack and chop away at Darwin’s writing to make it fit their caricature instead of addressing exactly what he wrote. But as I haven’t read it or any reviews, time will tell what this book actually is. Anyone who is genuinely curious, will purchase an unabridged copy and read his work for what it is.

    @yep – Herbert Spencer. In its day eugenics was backed by science and also by churches. When people have insufficient data, they will be more likely to do stupid things. IE/ Not knowing about germs and using bloodletting as a cure for disease. As we learn we abandon silly ideas. Are you saying that the theory of evolution is bad because people for a time backed eugenics? To put that kind of argument in perspective I’ll use a silly but parallel example. Remember the events of September 11? That was a very horrible event; we must therefore conclude that planes don’t fly.


  23. nullifidian

    June 25, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Two things:

    1) Francis Collins (the Human Genome guy) decided christianity was “true” because he, when out for a walk one day, saw a waterfall frozen into three streams (I shit you not!) (apparently something to do with the three gods the christians have) and nothing to do with DNA (yes, Comfort is still a lying git—so no surprise there); and
    2) you could do worse than linking the title of Expelled in your OP to Expelled Exposed.


  24. Eddie Van Helsing

    June 25, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Sometimes the public domain can be a real pain in the ass.


  25. Thomas

    June 26, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Publishing the Bible with a 50 page disclaimer? Great idea, I’m in.


  26. Michael

    June 30, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    I find it interesting the author of this website is telling people not to freely read something. If the atheist is truly a free being, then simply reading an opposing opinion should not be something to fear.

    The following is the most true statement written by a man I have ever read, please consider it:

    “Monstrous is the madness of the human mind that is more disposed to charge GOD with unrighteousness than to blame itself for blindness”.

    If you are truly open minded then you should be able to truly and openly, possibly be able to open mindedly entertain that you could possibly be wrong, or even possibly blinded in some way…

    If you are open minded, that is…

    Why do you suppose it is that men don’t like a man who one of his own disciples told a crowd…

    “How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him.” Acts 10:38

    Why would not the really open minded world embrace such a man?

    What else is it about Him or what He said that bothers really open minded people?

    Any ideas?


  27. Jacob Fortin

    June 30, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    So I’m close minded because I’m advising people that Intelligent Design is false? We all have to strike a balance between keeping an open mind, and rejecting information we know to be false. ID is nothing more than gussied up religious creationism. All you prove, Mike, is that there is a definite connection between ID and religiosity.

    Try not to be so open minded that your brain falls out.


  28. Michael

    June 30, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Hi Jacob,

    What is religiosity?

    I am not interested in these man made labels…

    Religion is where man invents his own God and how to appease him all the while being corrupt in their natures.

    Are we not talking about origins and how we got here?

    You may call me religeous or like Kirk Cameron a “Jesus Freak”, but that has nothing to do with how we got here.

    If you are open minded then why mock the author(s) and let others make up their minds.

    By the way, I know the atheist is alot closer to the truth than most so called “Christians” today in the west.

    At least somewhere down in your inner being you fear God enough to know that you must disprove His existence, because if “He is” at least you are smart enough to know you are in trouble (if He is real).

    When I was where you are I had to be open minded enough to truly look at all points of view, are you this open minded, have you ever approached the creator question with enough honesty to entertain that you might be wrong?

    How sure are you there is no God?

    Are you absolutely sure?

    I know you are not sure any more than anyone else if they are intellectually honest.

    Is science absolutely perfect?

    Let’s you and I look back in time at the steadfastness of scientific unchangeable “for sures”…

    I appreciate the exchange, your website is well done, good job!

    Thanks, Mike


  29. Lifer

    June 30, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    I suggest an amendment to the thread title then: Don’t buy this version of “Origin of Species”

    If you ever come across it, pick it up, read the first 50 pages, spend 2 hours researching why it is wrong (if you don’t already know) and move on with your life.

    “At least somewhere down in your inner being you fear God enough to know that you must disprove His existence, because if “He is” at least you are smart enough to know you are in trouble (if He is real).”

    This is the most ridiculous argument. I was afraid of Freddy Krueger when I was 6 years old. I outgrew fear of fictional characters as I aged. I’m not running around disproving the existence of Freddy Krueger.

    If you’re believing in a god because you’re afraid of him, or even the possibility of him, then I don’t know what else to do but feel sorry for you. The burden of proof is on the believer not the non-believer. Atheists aren’t really disproving anything and don’t make any claims to that effect that I’m aware of. Belief in a god doesn’t mean you have to disprove all other gods does it? We’re all agnostic in the face of an infinite possible set of gods.

    “Is science absolutely perfect?

    Let’s you and I look back in time at the steadfastness of scientific unchangeable “for sures”…”

    I puke a little in my mouth when I read this line of reasoning. You see, one of the wonderful aspects of science is that it changes with new evidence. I don’t see how you can believe it an argument against science when essentially stating, “Science once asserted X is true, we now know that it is not. Because X is wrong we conclude that science can be wrong. Therefore, all of science can be wrong.” It’s an extrapolation of what you said so correct me if I’ve misinterpreted your intent. Show me where science is claiming anything near ‘perfection’.

    The faithful, in infinite arrogance, are the only people I know of that are proclaiming unchanging truths from their source of information. I have to leave work now!


  30. Michael

    July 1, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Hi lifer,

    I appreciate your comments, thank you for responding, however, this will be my last post because round and round debate never gets anywhere.

    I will address first your first comment.

    Comparing your creator to Freddy Krueger is ridiculous at best, blasphemous at worst.

    The reason you could make such a comparison is because you have willfully refused to ever give God and His Word any serious look to see what He possibly has revealed of Himself to us.

    Yes, He should be feared, He is Holy, righteous and absolutely pure.
    I see no-where where He makes any apologies for commanding your fear and awe.

    If we have no fear of authority of any kind in life we both know this would be called anarchy.

    If you were blessed to have a good earthly Dad, you probably feared his punishment when you willfully did wrong…

    Second and last, you over exaggerate my point on science (knowledge)…

    Is humankind perfect?

    If not, science and all we think we know has limits and yes, it is flawed.

    Look at what science is now finding out about cells with new technology, all of what it takes to produce one live cell is a random cosmic accident?

    I may be stupid as can be, but I cannot figure out how non-life, no-life, no-thing, produced living, live things…

    I would hope anyone reading this had one little shred of sanity and could open their eyes to see the truth…

    Ever look at DNA?

    Ever seen the Sun, 1 million times earths size and burns incredibly hot and never extinguishes?

    Seen the new furthest from us Galaxy with approximately 14.5 million stars?

    Seen the new black hole?

    We are so small but think we are so big…

    The only thing any of us are guaranteed to know for sure is we all die one day…

    But, in closing I know why we run from truth, it is found in the following…

    John 3:19-20 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.

    1Cor 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

    2 Cor 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

    The truth about all of us is, we love doing our own thing and throw off anyone greater than us even being a possibility. We think we are our own god.

    Please repent all of you and turn to the LORD so that times of refreshing will come from Him…

    Respectfully, Mike


  31. andrew

    July 2, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    May I suggest a title for the bible we would like to see published, drawing attention to the bizarrae statements and other flaws?

    The Holey Bible


  32. andrew

    July 2, 2009


  33. Lifer

    July 2, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Michael,

    I have the feeling that you are placing God as the answer to all these questions because you either haven’t the intelligence to research the answers on your own or it is just easier for you to not even think about it. If ‘God did it’ is your answer to every question, we can’t have a rational conversation. If you’re going to quote scripture to me as some form of evidence you aren’t going to succeed, I’d rather you attempt with some Dr. Suess. At least it rhymes.


  34. Syd

    July 15, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Kirk Cameron is moronic for doing this. I believe that even if I was a Christian, I would be disappointed in this. Sigh, atheism for the win.


  35. Zombie Jesus

    July 16, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    A) DNA is too complex for us to understand

    B) ?

    C) Proof of existence of an omnipotent creator


  36. InjunTrouble

    July 24, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Everyday, something happens to reaffirm the decision I made to homeschool my kids. If I ever do decide to check this book out, my children will know it’s Darwin’s sh*t, pimped out Xtian-style. They’ve read the ‘real’ book already.


  37. ShawnT

    August 23, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    We need to get the Atheist Alliance to print bibles with a 50 to 100 page introduction stating how full of shit the book is just as stated in the article above. I would be happy to donate a 1k a month for the next year or two to fund that project, and I know plenty of others would would donate as well!! Lets hand them out at the top Christian Universities and Churches all over the country.


  38. Just Some Guy

    September 8, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Good idea.

    Please put me down for two copies of your “Bible 2.0″ ;)


  39. Just Some Guy

    September 8, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    By the way…did you download the PDF of the intro here? http://www.livingwaters.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=383

    The file (and front page) is entitled “Origin Of Species” – thus misrepresenting the introduction itself as Darwin’s book in its entirety.

    Isn’t there anyone to bring a suit? :(


  40. Ace Coggins

    October 8, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    A bible with a disclaimer…. That’s effectively along the same lines as this Darwin edit. Imagine the bible with an atheistic foreword.

    I understand the ID idea because logically, it is impossible to have something out of nothing. Christianity conveniently plugged this gap by listing a quality of God as Creator-ex-nihilo, which means ‘creator out of nothing’.

    Although i believe the logic to be true, why does ‘God’ should He exist, be used as the physical creator?


  41. Melkiha

    October 11, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Just accept the book, read the darn 50 pages of trash for a good laugh and then rip them off.
    The rest is worth keeping.

    I used to get annoyed, then mad, at those stupid christian rants, but now I just have a good laugh.


  42. Aphanes

    October 14, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    Richard Dawkins: “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” So therefore, in theist terms, there must be a god. The problem is theists use a different form of English to scientists. The important word in this statement by Dawkins is “appearance”, not “designed” and in fact he is saying exactly the opposite to “he understands that something must have created everything” meaning that “something” is a god, unless of course by “something” you mean evolution.


  43. Mark

    November 5, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    I 100% agree attacking Darwinism is NOT the answer. I am baffled by the point of the 50 page indictment and I assure you many Christians do not support this publishing endeavor. I totally respect Darwin’s work, even though I have some fundamental problems with it— as many intellectuals, theologians, and philosophers do.


  44. Shandler Mackenzie

    November 13, 2009

    Comment Arrow

    The Mennonites of 19th century England (along with the Quakers and some Anglican clergy too) were anti-racists in 19th century England. The Mennonites almost universally opposed the slave trade and saw all ethnicities as equal. With that being said, Kirk Cameron is ridiculous and this whole idea of “baiting” people into reading about Darwin’s ideas strikes me as really disingenuous at best. Then again, I’m a fan of pluralism, so if they wanna publish it, they should be able to, even if it’s ultimately a load of shit. Attacking Richard Dawkins in order to disprove Darwin’s (essentially proven!) theories is a straw man technique…but I wouldn’t expect and reasonable scholarship from Kirk Cameron in the first place.


  45. creationist

    January 14, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    people, you guys have no idea how RIGHT that book is….and really, do you have to be so bad mouthing? here is a quote:they have to try to sabotage the learning process in order to force their sky god down our throats.

    i mean really, do we creationists say that? and that was in context too!

    so if you want to argue creationism or evolution, please go contact kirk camron, or ben stien and argue with them, or do what Lee strobel did.

    i can expect some bad language after this post, and some name calling, but then that shows how quick you people are at putting other people down. and if that is what evolution does to people who go along with that THEORY. then i don’t want to be part of it.


  46. creationist

    January 14, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    also, just a thought. despite all the years Darwin’s theory has engaged our schools and minds, we still have not found COMPLETELY UNDENIABLE PROOF of fossils that show a transitional species. however, the bible is used to find ancient cities and has the same theme despite being written over hundreds of years. can Darwin’s origin of species say the same?


  47. Matty J

    January 14, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    This is going to sound arrogant.

    With most topics of discussion I like to believe that I argue in a civil manner. But atheists like myself find the stupidity of creationists very very frustrating. It’s hard to stay civil when your constantly banging your head against a wall. It’s like having an argument with an over confident 4 year old. You don’t deserve the respect. If you want to be treated like an adult then stop believing in fairly tales. Otherwise when you speak up and raise the same ridiculously brainless points you mention above then you’ll continue to be shot down in flames using not so polite language.

    Insert Neanderthal sounding voice:
    - “we still have not found completely undeniable proof of fossils that show a transitional species”.
    - Evolution is just a “THEORY”.

    Your probably a kind hearted decent person and that’s all that really matters. But for fucks sake! Wake up to yourself!


  48. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Matty, thank you for replying, but you haven’t given me any evidence for evolution, please give me some good hard evidence so that i might think it over. as for the bible being a bunch of fairy tales, why did primitive man come up with such an idea? it doesn’t seem rational for some scum water to suddenly think. “is there a god?” in fact, if you can tell me how a monkey on two legs could suddenly think deep profound thoughts, ill look it over.

    please no flaming, as it does not lead to a good debate, and i know debate.

    in reply to your saying that “creationists are 4 year olds” shouldn’t the “parent” continue to try “correct” their children? and anyway, as i said, your bad language has simply shown me what horrible debaters you people are. all flaming and no evidence.


  49. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    also, here is some proof that there is a designer for creation: Cells, if you can explain how such a complex and amazing “simple life form” came into being out of some dead watery soup, then i’ll seriously consider becoming an atheist.


  50. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Another topic to bring up….why is it that Christianity is the most persecuted religion in the world, almost every country today is very very hostile. and what has Christianity done to them? nothing! it hasn’t disobeyed the laws without good reason, and creationism is mostly shut down in most places. if your a christian, the answer would be Satan and his demons, if your not, you will not come up with a very solid answer.


  51. Matty J

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Mate, there’s shit loads of evidence on evolution out there published by people plenty smarter than you and me. Try Richard Dawkins latest book, “The Greatest Show On Earth: The Evidence for Evolution”.
    “here is some proof that there is a designer for creation: Cells, if you can explain how such a complex and amazing “simple life form” came into being out of some dead watery soup, then I’ll seriously consider becoming an atheist.”
    Once again, this is just the sort of comment that wraps things up nicely. The difference between an atheist and a theist is simply fear and stupidity. Some people just can’t accept/comprehend that we don’t know all the answers yet. The thought that this is the only existence we will ever experience and that we don’t know what the fuck it is scares the shit out of people like you. So your default answer is a nice comfortable, “God did it”. And then you make a GIANT fucking leap of reasoning and say that this being also published a book on how to live!? Sweet! Now I don’t have to be scared anymore!
    And what really gets me is that, whatever the answer to your question is, it applies to every living thing. Why do people like you put human beings up on such a high petal stool!? We’re just bald monkeys buddy!
    “Mankind has shown its insecurity by its belief in a greater purpose.” — -Michael Pain
    The human race will hopefully get there one day. In the very very distant future we may evolve enough intelligence to answer these questions. In the mean time just chill the fuck out and enjoy.

    “most persecuted religion in the world”!? What the fuck? Am I missing something here? Maybe it’s because I live in Australia and I’m very naive to this statement. But all my religious mates don’t seem too persecuted? Besides me paying the shit out of them for being stupid, we get along fine. Can another Atheist out there shed some like on this question?


  52. Matty J

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Whoops! – Can another Atheist out there shed some light on this question?


  53. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    ummmmm your religious mates are not in china being hit with cattle prods every 3 minuets. as for your evidence, i could say the same thing with “Answers in genesis” find your evidence and books there. as for saying “lets just say god did it” really? that the best answer? i could say, “lets just say that millions of years happend”

    and no. god didn’t publish it, he inspired it.

    as for evolving to a higher state,i don’t think we can get any higher, mainly due to the fact that 11 years ago the ipod was not even thought of, and now look! all this new tech! whats to say that the people during biblical times were not making great inroads.


  54. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    another to “God did it”

    i can not leave the bible and the God of the bible out of this conversation. just as you cannot leave all the books on evolution out of this conversation.

    if you can support your view with out referencing to any of the evolutionist worldview, i won’t use the bible.


  55. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    in response to your other arguement, the “bald monkey one”

    how is it that out of all the creatures on earth, we only “evolved” to an extent that we actually think the way we do?


  56. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    and another response to your “we haven’t evolved enough to understand things”

    how is it that we can say God did it but you can’t say evolution did it?
    you evolutionist are devoting millions of dollars to fund your finds and research, but all that money, the best tech available, all that time since. nothing.

    you will most likely reply we aren’t that advanced, but that seems to be a version of my answer, “God did it”


  57. Matty J

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    “i can not leave the bible and the God of the bible out of this conversation. just as you cannot leave all the books on evolution out of this conversation.”

    Yes I can, my books are written and peer reviewed by some of the greatest minds in the world. They rely on evidence. Your book was written in the bronze age by people “inspired” by a mythical creature. This is why atheists like myself have a problem with religion. You all have your different versions of the “truth” that you fight over. Your all wrong, and the sooner you all realise it the better.


  58. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    ok, then convince me that the world was formed by millions of years with out your evolutionary worldview.


  59. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    as a response to different denominations, all i can say is, how do you destroy something? by causing everyone to fight each other, and if you really want to know, their is such thing as the supernatural. why else would that be a topic that fascinates people. because something did happen.


  60. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    supernatural, sorry, bad grammar.


  61. creationist

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    by the way, nice debating with you. i have always wanted to do this exchange of worldviews.


  62. Matty J

    January 15, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Mate, seriously, if you don’t have the brain power to figure out for yourself that the earth is millions of years old then there’s no hope. That’s fairly basic shit. Like I said, trying to argue with a 4 year old. There’s no such thing as the super natural. If you can prove that there is then make sure you hook me up with a 10% finders fee: http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/1m-challenge.html

    The sad thing about all this is that people like you are so completely brainwashed that there’s no return to listening to reason and logic. The best us atheists can hope for is that your deluded perception of the world will die with you.

    No worries. It is enjoyable debating this with you. I know I come across harsh but it’s nothing personal. I assume your from the states? Your the first proper creationist I have argued with. They seem to be a dying breed here in Oz.


  63. creationist

    January 16, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    you assumed correctly, by the way, i won’t be debating anymore on this subject. (not saying that you won, but that’s up to you) See ya later! :D


  64. creationist

    January 22, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    ok im back with a new arguement.

    have there been any recordings of macro-evolution that is observational?

    please no flaming.


  65. Kevin

    January 26, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    @creationist:

    See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ho7GaI2rCwI&feature=related if you’re going to ask that question.


  66. creationist

    January 30, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    thank you kevin for your time. however, the evolution you promote still requires that a bacteria turn into a “higher creature” say, a jelly fish like creature, now, i don’t see how a group of independent bacteria, would group and over 1000000s of years, slowly fuse into one single minded creature.
    As for definition for kind or species, what creationists mean (or my def. in any case) is Family, which is taken from the classification system. yes the cat is in the same kingdom/phylum/class/order, as the dog, but not in the same Family. also, a horsky (horse plus donkey) is still in the same Family.

    addressing the term of adding new information on the genes, you can’t add new info to a chromosome that turns one creature into a radically different creature, mutations don’t add, despite all the superheroes falling into radioactive material. you will not gain extra strength, your body is programed not to exceed a certain limit of strength. mutations cause a loss of info. such as the blind salamander.

    that my esteemed opponent, is what i am getting at, a bacterium forming into a larger more “advanced” creature, like a jellyfish, which some how turns into a fish…


  67. Kevin

    February 1, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    @Creationist:

    Horsky?… They’re called mules / hinnies and they’re almost complete sterile (60 documented cases of fertile female mules, 1 documented case of a fertile female hinny, and 0 fetile males) – thus horses and donkeys are different species.

    That point aside. It’s all about genes and alleles and transfering of information from parent to offspring. Don’t discount the element of time. There’s been almost 4 billion years of life on this planet. I’ve lived for 25 years. Life has been on this planet 160,000,000 times longer than I’ve been alive. 25 years seems like a long time, I can’t even begin to fathom 4 billion years.

    Mutations aren’t all bad – http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB102.html – read that for a better definition. If you’re really interested in learning, Talk Origins has a lot of very helpful – if possibly a little advanced – information.


  68. Charlie

    February 3, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Christianity is a rat, dying in the sewer. Illogically, it attacks others that have a better chance of survival, but it is fighting a fight it cannot win.


  69. JamesBain

    February 22, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I find the most compelling evidence for evolution and the horrendous space kablooie (big bang for all you calvin and hobbes-impaired humans) to be the discovery of technetium, which had, unknown until we discovered precisely how this element came to be, a radioactive half-life of around 400,000 years.
    But don’t take my word for it. Look it up. Draw your own conclusions.


  70. Arnie

    February 25, 2010


  71. Bill

    February 25, 2010


  72. Halo

    February 25, 2010


  73. Arnie

    February 25, 2010


  74. Arnie

    February 25, 2010


  75. Kir

    February 25, 2010


  76. Hero

    February 26, 2010


  77. Bill

    February 26, 2010


  78. Aron

    February 26, 2010


  79. Kir

    February 27, 2010


  80. Hero

    February 27, 2010


  81. Diesel

    February 27, 2010


  82. Kir

    February 27, 2010


  83. Arnie

    February 27, 2010


  84. Heel

    February 27, 2010


  85. Diesel

    February 27, 2010


  86. Diesel

    February 27, 2010


  87. Hero

    February 27, 2010


  88. Arnie

    March 1, 2010


  89. Aron

    March 1, 2010


  90. Kir

    March 1, 2010


  91. Dominic

    March 1, 2010


  92. Diesel

    March 1, 2010


  93. Arnie

    March 3, 2010


  94. Aron

    March 3, 2010


  95. Arnie

    March 3, 2010


  96. Hero

    March 3, 2010


  97. Hero

    March 3, 2010


  98. Halo

    March 3, 2010


  99. Halo

    March 4, 2010


  100. Jane

    March 6, 2010


  101. SC

    March 8, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Fuck You Ray Comfort and Kirk Cameron, you twisted scumbags! Take this book and shove it up each other’s asses. While you’re at it, shove your bibles up your asses too.


  102. Kir

    March 9, 2010


  103. Arnie

    March 12, 2010


  104. KasiSE

    March 17, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I could never understand why if someone believes in creationism that they can’t also believe in evolution. If everyone pretty much agrees that there is some form of intelligent design within the universe, then why wouldn’t it be intelligent enough to factor in evolution? I have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA why we can’t find missing links, which is a pretty BIG HOLE in evolutional theory. But my former argument still stands. Personlly, I like looking up at the stars realizing that we’re flying through space by the seat of our pants and I have no idea how we got here … it makes getting up in the morning kind of interesting, don’t you think?


  105. Arnie

    March 25, 2010


  106. Factual

    April 14, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    KasiSE, which “missing links” are you talking about?
    If you mean transitional fossils, we have literal tons of them. You can find lists of them easily; try talkorigins for a start.

    Secondly, for anyone who thinks evolution is false:
    Every vaccine & cure we have ever developed, that works, was created using evolutionary biology. Our understanding of genetic diseases, of gene therapy, and of how virus strains work is all thanks to evolutionary biology.

    And to Mike: there is exactly as much evidence for your God as for Odin, Zeus, or Krishna. Your Bible has NOT been used to find any ancient cities; in fact, it is wholly wrong on not only their locations, but also on…
    -History (existence of cities during certain times, lack of records regarding Jesus’ execution, lack of evidence & water for a global flood)
    -Science (bats being birds, rabbits chewing cud)
    -Its own consistency (2 differing orders for Creation, Jesus’ lineage, variations between versions & translations)
    Answers In Genesis uses false claims and no science. Evolution is a scientific theory (aka explanation of many facts), just like gravity & electromagnetism & germ theory. It works when applied.

    /end rant


  107. Hero

    April 14, 2010


  108. Kipu Nerek

    April 25, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I’m going to coat-tail on what “Very Evolved” said… The way you connect to your audience is… Know who you are writing to. You need to pick a Target Audience and stick to them. You wouldn’t write to an audience of 14yr olds the same way you would write to an audience of 60yr olds.


  109. food warmers

    April 26, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Intimately, the article is in reality the freshest on this valuable topic. I match in with your conclusions and also definitely will eagerly look forward to your coming updates. Just saying thanks definitely will not simply just be enough, for the extraordinary lucidity in your writing. I will certainly correct away grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any kind of updates. De lightful work and much success in your business endeavors!


  110. Barry Pryor

    April 26, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    God, Jesus and the Pope are the biggest moneymaking businesses going. Dont think for one minute they or their spreaders of their words intend to get off their asses and work for a living. Hell the Catholics enen have their own tax free country. Charles Darwin has always been a thorn in their sides and they will never stop their brainwashing tatics as long as the per diem $’s keep rolling in…


  111. fenderflip

    April 30, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Why doesn’t the theory of evolution seem to take sentient intelligence into consideration? In fact, the only time you ever see the word intelligence in relationship to the the theory of evolution, it’s people talking about intelligent design. Which is funny, because it’s both, so I guess naturally they would be connected at the hip.


  112. Steve

    May 1, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Ya I’m not reading this book. I would hate to be influenced by the world majority on trivial subjects that determine the justification on weather or not i can have my cake and eat it, too. I mean, who are they to say i cant watch pron and hustle drugs on the street corner.


  113. Oakmeyer

    May 5, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Alright ,Michael, here we go:

    Lightning striking the ocean as well as cosmic rays from space cause mutations or changes in the basic chemicals that form the Earth, most likely those in the oceans (the earth is composed of stardust, chemicals and iron blown out by dying stars). As mutations occur and spread over long periods of time, they cause new chemicals to form. These chemicals randomly organize themselves (through electro-magnetic attraction) as self-replicating molecules over millions of years, some successful, some self defeating and dying off (evolution).
    Eventually these chemicals through millions of years evolve and change into various forms including the first organizing cells and then eventually into ocean dwelling species. These species through various mutations caused fins to grow more like limbs, as this was better for climbing onto land to find food. Remember, cosmic rays from dying stars sometimes cause bad changes
    in DNA, killing off the organism, but those that were resistant went on to reproduce. Eventually all life as we know it evolved from this series of mutations brought on by cosmic radiation. This is why it literally took BILLIONS of years to produce man as we know it. Oy, that’s about as simple as I can make it. Look it up! There’s info all over the internet.


  114. Comment Arrow

    Love the blog :D Bookmarked.


  115. tattoo

    June 2, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I love tats, great site!


  116. Comment Arrow

    Yes, I was very keen on that. So was my brother. He said he will check it out soon. We will be back before you can say anything.


  117. Alec Mota

    June 3, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Ugh, if only he would just go


  118. unlock iphone

    June 3, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Hi dee hi, in addition to do you think could very well hace one of the links to help them uncover one particular “phone” showcase? I0m like Mexico and is Website looking ahead to a lot result which explains why adjusts the product. Thaks Paul (incredibly important come up with advertsing name even as had been son and daughter)


  119. Comment Arrow

    good share, great article, very usefull for us..thanks!


  120. lawuniversity.cz.cc

    June 3, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Hi there could I reference some of the insight found in this blog if I reference you with a link back to your site?


  121. Homemade Energy

    June 3, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Alternative power can be a great choice when used properly.


  122. Cássia

    June 6, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Ei, Muito bom seu site… Já guardei em meus favoritos!


  123. am i pregnant quizzes

    June 8, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    How you find ideas for articles, I am always lack of new ideas for articles. Some tips would be great


  124. Maris Balog

    June 8, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I love more this simple website http://www.pornhub4u.com . just the best video from the web.


  125. play games

    June 9, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I put in a plug for your blog at mine. So, I think most people forget the points you are discussing.


  126. Free Optimizer

    June 9, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I am not really sure why , The developer has a Feedback section where you can report bugs


  127. petsafe bark collar

    June 17, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    This is just what I was looking for thanks for the info.


  128. Kir

    June 27, 2010


  129. Aron

    June 27, 2010


  130. Aron

    June 27, 2010


  131. Arnie

    June 27, 2010


  132. Kir

    June 27, 2010


  133. Bill

    June 27, 2010


  134. Dominic

    June 27, 2010


  135. Hero

    June 27, 2010


  136. Heel

    June 27, 2010


  137. Kir

    June 27, 2010


  138. Neo

    June 28, 2010


  139. Horacio Burgh

    June 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Thankyou for the excellent blog post.


  140. Bill

    June 28, 2010


  141. Burton Haynes

    June 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Although it?s barely two months old, it’s time to declare a best scene of Summer 2010. It certainly comes from just one of the year?s finest films (although at least 3 Rotten Tomatoes registered critics disagree with that assessment) and although it may appear to shortly to suggest it, there?s no doubting few will match it arrive July and/or August. As an alternative to offering an in-depth review of Toy History 3 (suffice it to say – it?s excellent!) let?s instead focus over a seminal sequence in the stellar Pixar trequel, a instant which will have numerous in tears and have far more than a number of covering their faces in fear. We are talking, obviously, about the SPOILER ALERT incinerator showdown, a instant which finds Buzz, Woody, plus the gang relying about the incorrect plaything to aid in their escape, a massive machine hurtling them ever closer to their doom, and just one moment of resolve that stands as one of probably the most emotional and heartfelt finales ever inside the history of film – live action or animated. Primary, a little plot point of view. Toy Tale 3 begins numerous years following the primary sequel. Andy is now a 17 year old college bound teen, and his collection of playthings are feeling the sting of neglect and doable disposal. Pushed to try and do something with the trinkets remaining, Andy decides to put them inside the attic. Instead, his bag is mistaken for trash, and our plastic heroes prevent the landfill by hiding out in an additional box intended for a nearby daycare. There, they discover a surreal situational pecking order. Leader toy Lotso Hugs the Bear (Ned Beatty) runs the place like a prison, placing the new ?recruits? within the Caterpillar Room alongside using the rambunctious, destructive toddlers. In case you survive, and aren?t sooner or later thrown out, you may possibly get to live out your days inside the serene fun with the older kids? Butterfly region. Desperate to break out, our familiar buddies escape through the only readily available way out – the garbage chute. Prior to long, they find themselves within the very same harmful dilemma they had been hoping to stay clear of inside very first spot. cover art work Toy Account three Director: Lee Unkrich Cast: Tom Hanks, Tim Allen, Joan Cusack, Ned Beatty, Don Rickles, Michael Keaton, Wallace Shawn, John Ratzenberger, Estelle Harris (Disney/Pixar; US theatrical: 18 Jun 2010 (Basic launch); UK theatrical: 18 Jun 2010 (General launch); 2010) Trailer Official Site Thus we appear to our important SPOILER warning. Again, as an alternative to reviewing the film itself, which requires the acknowledged repetition of sentiments expressed endlessly over the final few times, we will concentrate on just one sequence?again, call it the ?incinerator stand-off??and use it like a signifies of explaining Pixar?s enduring power inside of the artform. With their record currently at 11 – 0, the company has nevertheless to create a certified bomb and, for numerous, have only made masterpieces (each minor and main).
    From the case from the final act realization that they may possibly finish up on the inside a fiery inferno, the action from the titular toys is so moving, so incredibly simple that it shows how efficient less may be at expressing probably the most significant of emotions. As with a lot of action sequences, the last minute getaway appears imminent. Whilst Woody flails about manically, attempting to uncover the probable exit, the rest of his companions are much less certain. Sooner or later, they realize the hopelessness of their cause and commit an act so selfless, so instinctual of what we?ve felt for these characters, that is certainly stops your heart beat, if only for any moment. They start to hold hands. Primary Buzz and Jessie (if only accidentally), then Bullseye the horse as well as the Potato Heads. At some point, faces serene if even now slightly afraid, they look to their ersatz leader, Woody, for your ultimate link in their chain of fate. Seeing their reaction, their brave calm and sense of sacrifice, the cowboy that began the entire storyline two decades just before grabs their mold formed hands, and waits? It is a stunning sequence, one more stellar example on the boundaries Pixar keeps pushing. Final 12 months, the brilliant Up offered a silent ten minute montage which followed the romantic existence and eventual finish of lead misanthrope Carl Fredricksen?s fairytale marriage to childhood sweetheart Ellie. It represented a bold, broad stroke, a security in storytelling (and violation of kid vid tone) that only an amazingly talented entity could pull off. It was the same with Wall-E, where by the opening with the movie painted a dark, dismal portrait of a planet (Earth) actually choking on its personal filth. Ever since Cars, when the corporation was criticized for becoming as well cartoony and cloying, it appears that John Lasseter and also the gang have produced a conscious option to include as much dramatic material as they are able to, realizing that a solid narrative can tolerate such trepidation. Toy History 3 is possibly the pinnacle of this thought process. The whole movie can be a enjoy letter towards the travails of youth, a literal envisioning from the classic Bible line about ?putting aside childish things? as one particular matures. Andy?s dilemma isn’t so a great deal 1 of nostalgia as temporal causation. As he ages, his toys continue to be forever locked in his life on the past. The characters recognize this above and over again, arguing against what they see because inevitable providence for their kind?the dump, or in this case, the bowels of the blazing furnace. That following all of the bickering, back stabbing and bratling abuse, they pick to go out like heroes is the type of emotional epiphany the series continues to be recognized for?like Jessie?s Part 2 lament taken to its logical ends. Certainly, this definitely isn?t the end for that beloved playthings. SPOILER warning again?they get out with the jam only to face the ultimate decision: how you can endure a existence in Andy?s attic, waiting for that off probability that, someday, their former owner will have children of his personal and will look for out these symbols of his formative years for their amusement. That this gets resolved in a way that is both wholly satisfying yet tinged with sadness once again argues for what Pixar does far better than all others. Inside a genre that keeps demanding a increased level of performance every time, that does not wish to rest on its laurels so much as reinvent them inside a way that makes far more and a lot more money, the efforts of the company additional concerned with creativity than the bottom line is beyond refreshing. Whilst some thing might surpass it, the incinerator sequence can be a operate of fine art all its personal. The results is as potent as anything you?ll see all year?as is Toy Adventure 3.


  142. Arnie

    June 28, 2010


  143. Heel

    June 28, 2010


  144. Bill

    June 28, 2010


  145. Bill

    June 28, 2010


  146. Heel

    June 28, 2010


  147. Diesel

    June 28, 2010


  148. Cedar Park Bars

    June 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Does The Good Atheist like beer?


  149. Latonia Watkinson

    July 8, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Hi there, many peoples recommended me this software as a new wave antivirus system but I would need some advices as I’m not that techie myself, any advice would be greatly appreciate : antivirus security software


  150. Jaci

    July 19, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I’ve been trying to earn a living online for a few years. I was thinking about trying this program called blogging to the bank. Have any of you tried it? Here’s where I found it —> link.


  151. Lindsy Alcaide

    July 19, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    try it best .


  152. Marcene Bellman

    July 20, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Thanks for taking the time to write that, I found it very interesting. If you get a chance you should visit my blog as well. I hope you have a good day!


  153. Wedding Slideshows

    July 21, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Don’t really agree but every body is entitled to their opinion.


  154. Comment Arrow

    I love reading and I am always searching for informative information like this! You are bookmarked!. . . . . .


  155. Marlyn Whitehair

    August 1, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Great article, very well written and informative.


  156. party supplies

    August 10, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Fantastic blog! I genuinely love how it’s quick on my eyes and also the details is well written. I am wondering how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your rss feed which should do the trick! Have a nice day!


  157. Liberty fights

    August 14, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I like the way you capture the essence of the idea, truly excellent writting manner, I enojoyed it!


  158. HCG

    August 19, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    That is quite insightful. It gave me some ideas and I’ll be writing them on my website eventually. I’m bookmarking your blog and I’ll be back. Thanks again!


  159. Tymnmaps

    August 19, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    [url=http://elo.dorenweerd.nl/z/0be1-buy-soma-online-without-rx.php]7 dreampharmaceuticals from online order soma[/url] soma cod cheap fast = [url=http://www.fjs-torredeita.com.pt/moodle/z/99d7-order-soma-online.php]buy carisoprodol diazepam online soma[/url] soma rx = [url=http://moodle.lopionki.pl/z/5472-soma-without-a-prescription.php]canada drud soma[/url] keywords soma online = [url=http://moodle.queensburyschool.org/twt/z/beba8-where-to-order-soma.php]buy soma cheap no rx[/url] buy online soma usa = [url=http://www.wrc.net/moodle/z/fd074-q-buy-soma.php]indianhead soma online[/url] buying cheap soma free delivery


  160. diet software

    August 20, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    This is my first time I have read this blog. I think it’s going to save me allot of time and effort. diet software


  161. diet software

    August 20, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I’ve be all over the internet the last few days digesting every piece of information I can great article thanks. diet software


  162. diet software

    August 20, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I’ve be all over the internet the last few days digesting every piece of information I can great article thanks. diet software


  163. Telmslish

    August 21, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    DELETE THIS TOPIC!!


  164. Eliseo Mangat

    August 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Excellent post on scholarships! I found this amazing site through google and you guys might want to check it out as well, GPA Scholarships offers over 10,000 dollars in grants and tuition money for students in college.

    Check it out!

    - All the best


  165. Young Jeezy

    August 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I’m a little dazed what exactly is provided in the writing.


  166. Dexter Glapion

    August 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Chmmm, they made most parts payable, so my choice went into pornhub4u.com http://www.pornhub4u.com free amateur videos tube. It looks like they are growing fast and most my friends are visiting it daily.


  167. Tyson Larranaga

    August 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    The mobile equivelent to this site is http://iphone.pornhub4u.com, They too have thousands of free, full length movies that stream perfectly to your iphone or palm pre


  168. Fe Neira

    August 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Great quality lots of variety http://www.pornhub4u.com


  169. Kir

    August 28, 2010


  170. Angelita Buchanan

    August 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Major thankies for the article post.Much thanks again. Great.


  171. Diesel

    August 28, 2010


  172. carpenter Milford

    August 29, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Im training for my national pro card in bodybuilding and reading this has been a great help! Thank you :-)


  173. Neo

    August 29, 2010


  174. Aron

    August 29, 2010


  175. Denver dentists

    August 29, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I just started bodybuilding and weight training. My current routine is bicep curls and bench press 6 days a week / for 1 hour a time. Working hard! :-) but havent seen any results yet.


  176. Salt Lake therapists

    August 29, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    you should post up pictures of yourself LOL. bet u are a fat guy with no muscle. im a pro bodybuilder and know what im talking about.


  177. Bill

    August 29, 2010


  178. movers in Kansas

    August 29, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    You are a skinnyfat, ugly, weak-ass noob. I can’t believe you are spouting this BS when u have no idea what your talking about. i bet you cant even bench 100 pounds.


  179. Ontario city dentists

    August 29, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    HOW DARE YOU DELETE MY COMMENT. Good censorship you’ve got here


  180. Kettering dentists

    August 29, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Your server keeps crashing. I’ve been to this weblog 3 periods today and usually instances the page does not load. What webhosting business do you use ?


  181. Comment Arrow

    The layout of one’s weblog is completely messed up when I view it in Opera. Plz fix it.


  182. Heel

    August 29, 2010


  183. Joseph Ericson

    August 29, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    This really is a terrific source of information you happen to be providing and you give it free of charge. I enjoy seeing internet sites that comprehend the importance of supplying a prime resource for nothing. Many thanks!


  184. bark collar dogs

    August 31, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Unless the bark is removed completely all the way around the trunk, exposing the cambrium region, the tree should survive. If you want to protect the wound you can paint it with sealant available at home improvement garden centers.


  185. Expatriate Health Insurance

    August 31, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Awesome blog article.Much thanks again.


  186. Outdoor Banner Stands

    August 31, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I think this is a real great article.Thanks Again. Will read on…


  187. Rolland Rosenberry

    August 31, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    And although slightly different, the way people will react to changes due to global warming is similar in many ways, because it’s in the human nature. And mass hysteria is the last thing anyone wants but if it happens, you don’t want to be part of it …


  188. Prasenjit

    September 8, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    The debate between theists and atheists can continue, but this is an absolutely ridiculous way to get one’s own viewpoint across the table. The book’s preamble preaches something that the core content does not support! A new low truly.


  189. San Jose Dental

    September 25, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    This is extreme to the point of slander. I believe that it is to everyones interest to respect the other side, even if you don’t believe it.


  190. UK's Affordable Life Insurance

    September 28, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Thanks. Would really like to see a Facebook fanpage and on twitter so that I could follow and subscribe to it ;)


  191. Banish Rosacea

    October 21, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    I’m bookmarking your blog and I’ll be back. Thanks again!


  192. Banish Rosacea Review

    October 21, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    do you know where i can get the wp theme for Banish Rosacea?


  193. Katherin Brakebill

    October 23, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Thanks for supplying some reliable information on this topic. I have discovered a wide variety of savvy information about natural health and some unreliable recommendations. Do you have any more good ideas or places on the Internet that I can find more detailed suggestions? This would be certainly appreciated! Either way, continue the good work!


  194. scene porn

    October 23, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    mmmmmm emo porn


  195. Vickie @ Diamondback Store

    November 1, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Hi there, just browsing for information for my Diamondback site. Truly more information than you can imagine on the web. Wasn’t exactly what I was looking for, but great site. Have a nice day.


  196. Vupzzqcy

    November 12, 2010


  197. Correction tape

    November 18, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    You have done a terrific job communicating your message. I totally agree with your opinion. Thanks! Your atical is really surprising.The article is very helpful to me. The more I read, the more I keep coming back! Thanks for give quite excellent informations. You’re amazing. Your web is greatI am impressed by the details that you’ve on this blog.


  198. Hairstyles

    November 25, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    origin of species is really well written book and thanks for the review given here :=)


  199. Comment Arrow

    I don’t have health insurance on my dogs, but we do have insurance on them for when they are in the car with us [[if we get in an accident]]. It costs us an extra 50 dollars every 6 months for all 3 of our dogs, which are 2 pit/lab mixes, and a purebred apbt.


  200. robot multifonction

    December 3, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    Unhappy for the vast inspect, but I’m truly loverlike the new Zune, and hope this, as good as the fantabulous reviews both else grouping written, module aid you terminate if it’s the far for you.


  201. Kina Santo

    December 17, 2010

    Comment Arrow

    You completed a few fine points there. I did a search on the issue and found nearly all folks will have the same opinion with your blog.


  202. Natali

    January 17, 2011

    Comment Arrow

    Hello friends,this is a nice site and I wanted to post a note to let you know, good job! Thanks
    Best regards, Natali, CEO of iso burner


  203. DiziDukkani

    January 25, 2011

    Comment Arrow

    <a href="http://www.dizidukkani.com&quot; rel="external" title="dizi izle,canli dizi izle,full dizi izle


  204. Super Foods

    April 5, 2011

    Comment Arrow

    I’ll be sure not to read it, thanks.


  205. Tattoolog

    June 19, 2011

    Comment Arrow

    origin of species is really well written book and thanks for the review given here


  206. Treasa Klauer

    August 26, 2011

    Comment Arrow

    Really Appreciate this update, how can I make is so that I receive an email sent to me every time you write a new post?



Member Login

Login Status

You are not currently logged in.






» Register
» Lost your Password?

Video Of The Day

If you have videos to submit, click here

T-Shirt

You love the show, now get the shirt!!!!

Sponsor

If you would like to become a sponsor, click here

Facebook Fanpage

Be sure to visit our fanpage: click here