Did you ever try to use the old “I didn’t know it was a illegal” defense when caught breaking the law? I’ve never been arrested, but I assume it’s pretty normal that some people would try and use this lame excuse in order to avoid doing jail time. There are, however, certain times when this type of defense will do more harm than good. Case and point: retired Archbishop Rembert G. Weakland and his statements that he had no idea that child abuse was a crime. Weakland apparently “accepted naively the common view that it was not necessary to worry about the effects on the youngsters: either they would not remember or they would ‘grow out of it.”
This is the same guy that in 2002 paid $450,000 to a man that had accused him of date rape, so his credibility on the issue of child molesting is somewhat hurt by this inconvenience. The fact that this monster thinks kids can “grow” out of being sexually abused just demonstrates the kind of willful ignorance and deception that is part of the Catholic Church’s modus operandi. How can the devout keep believing in light of such tragic and despicable representatives? I got news for you: if these guys are closer to divinity than the rest of us, we all need to collectively jump off this religion bandwagon right fucking now. Who’s with me!?
(props to freethinker for the find)





May 21st, 2009 at 7:00 pm
WOW, this dickhead is now making a book on how he molested children???
Fuck what is this world coming too, I think that we should issue a world wide boycott on that shit, its disgusting that he actually molested children and to profit on that shit is truely evil.
May 22nd, 2009 at 4:05 am
To be honest I can see the argument as being valid sometimes. Not in this case, or in cases of murder or other “obvious crimes”. I went to school in Sweden for a number of years, and generally we didn’t get any classes in swedish law, so how am I supposed to know what I can do within the law? Should I know the entire law? (That would require me to spend €150 on a big big book.) So, I do consider the argument as being valid, but not i violent crimes.
May 23rd, 2009 at 9:51 am
would you consider murdering people like these a crime?